Aviation Week & Space Technology, 03/13/2006, page 23
Edited by David Bond
NASA says it's pleased with the number of bids it received Mar. 3 for its $500-million Commercial Orbital Transportation Services (COTS) demonstration program from "the full spectrum of industry." But the space agency doesn't plan to announce any winners until this summer, and some industry insiders won't be surprised to find only familiar--and big--corporate names on that list. The COTS program was designed to spur private investment by space entrepreneurs willing to take some risks hauling cargo and eventually crew to the International Space Station. But even with $500 million potentially available for demonstrations over the next five years, and the possibility of contracts worth much more than that, many investors consider the gamble too risky. NASA can't guarantee that there will be money for the program even in Fiscal 2007, when it is seeking authorization to spend $91 million. And long-term figures show NASA support for ISS dropping to zero in less than 10 years. Given the kind of money it would take to build the needed spacecraft, big players like Boeing and Lockheed Martin are seen as more likely to have pockets deep enough to go after the seed money than the small entrepreneurs it was designed to attract.
I think that NASA needs more options--and Commercial Orbital Transportation Services is an ideal way for the private secotr to step up to the plate. Anytime the number of available launchers increases, then responsiveness to possible orbital emergencies also increases. Also, by taking the 'mule traffic' and placing it into private sector hands, then companies can compete to economically transport goods to the space station--the company that can do the job on time and on budget will naturally evolve to the front of the 'pack.'
And I bet NASA could learn a thing or two from private sector. Instead of competing with them or interfering with them, NASA should welcome them and see what they come up with. Instead of NASA being the Space Regulatory Agency, why not let the FAA handle licensing instead. Who knows, the FAA may eventually evolve into the FASA: Federal Aerospace Administration, which would be a responsible oversite agency for licensing and safety. NASA could then do what it does best: Research and Exploration. Maybe food for thought.
Private sector space is already happening: the FAA has already approved several space shots, including the Space Ship One X-Prize run. They have made it clear that they intend to approve more...
NASA Expected To Choose CEV Contractor by Fall 2006
By Brian Berger, Space News Staff Writer
posted: 31 March 2006
<SNIP>
Commercial ISS flights
In parallel to the NASA-led CEV development, the agency plans to spend $500 million over the next five years on a demonstration program meant to coax into existence a low-cost alternative to the CEV for International Space Station resupply and crew rotation missions.
Proposals were due March 3. NASA is expected to announce its selections in early June.
NASA spokeswoman Dolores Beasley said the agency received proposals "from a wide variety of organizations across the full spectrum of industry." While declining to say how many proposals NASA received, she said the agency was "pleased with industry's response" to the solicitation.
Sources following the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services competition said NASA received about 20 proposals. These same sources said NASA plans to inform the field of competitors in early April whether they made the short list for further consideration. Beasley would not confirm that a preliminary down-select was under way, saying that internal milestones and other such information is considered "competition sensitive" and would not be released.