Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: Building a Nuclear Ship in Orbit


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 8
Date:
Building a Nuclear Ship in Orbit


Watching the budding private space industry is very cool. Given that in 10 years the private companies have an effective earth to LEO solution.

I couldn't help but start wondering after looking at Bigelow Inflatable Modules that he uses for earth to lunar ship.


http://www.bigelowaerospace.com/

Rip those chemical engines off and put some Nuclear Engines on them instead.

I haven't seen anyone take a pass and use this new crop of technology coming to build a nuclear ship.

So what could be built in 10-15 years? I'm sure Rutan or someone wants some real speed.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:

I'm still a bit skeptical about inflatable modules. They do have advantages over rigid modules in weight and flexibility (both physical flexibility and flexibility of design) but I'm still a bit concerned about micrometeoroid impact and radiation shielding during solar storms. Aluminum alloy can dent and deform under impact, while an inflatable could puncture. Certainly many puncture and impact resistant fabrics are available (such as Kevlar with Kapton film) but imingement by atomic oxygen, common in LEO, could erode organic polymers seriously. This is of course why they are testing the modules abord Russian rockets first...

Yet, I will watch with interest any new developments that surface. I certainly wish Bigelow Aerospace the best of luck in developing this technology--perhaps they will win over even the skeptics amongst us. I hope so...

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 21
Date:


GoogleNaut wrote:

I'm still a bit skeptical about inflatable modules. They do have advantages over rigid modules in weight and flexibility (both physical flexibility and flexibility of design) but I'm still a bit concerned about micrometeoroid impact and radiation shielding during solar storms. Aluminum alloy can dent and deform under impact, while an inflatable could puncture. Certainly many puncture and impact resistant fabrics are available (such as Kevlar with Kapton film) but imingement by atomic oxygen, common in LEO, could erode organic polymers seriously. This is of course why they are testing the modules abord Russian rockets first...

Yet, I will watch with interest any new developments that surface. I certainly wish Bigelow Aerospace the best of luck in developing this technology--perhaps they will win over even the skeptics amongst us. I hope so...


I suppose,inflateable habitats are only suitable for emergency use.Kindley Regards Martin

__________________
Martin Schwingenheuer


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:

Well, they could be used for that too. I'm just not quite convinced of the safety aspects. Still, I can be convinved, it just takes a good deal of effort. I think that Bigelow Aerospace is going about it the right way. This is the age old mantra of any flyable hardware: Test, Test, Test...


__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 411
Date:

Space suits seem reasonably safe...


(and they're "inflatable")



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:

I know, but I'm just too 'rigid' to change...

Well, O.K., bad joke...

Inflatable modules might be the right way to go. I'd be a little concerned about impact with micrometeoroids and radiation shielding....

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard