Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: NASTY ANTI NUKES TRASH IDAHO MEETING


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
NASTY ANTI NUKES TRASH IDAHO MEETING



"A hostile and unwavering crowd clashed with officials from the U.S. Department of Energy at the Sun Valley Inn Wednesday night, turning the DOE's first public hearing regarding the proposed production of plutonium-238 at the Idaho National Laboratory into a verbal slugfest." http://www.mtexpress.com/index2.php?ID=2005104284


This just shows the lengths antinuclear philosophy will go, with its rampant mindless uncompromising SUV driving clueless peoples' desire to live back in the Stone Age.



__________________
Bruce Behrhorst


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:

Unfortunately, without sources of energy such as nuclear power, we're all going to be in trouble. The current level of our civilization, without the intrinsically high energy demands, would perish within a few days time. Once starvation and chaos ensues, then a precipitous population crash will follow.

A very messy, and avoidable 'future.' Future energy demands require exploitation of energy sources such as nearer term advanced nuclear, and longer term perhaps solar power satellites or fusion power (if that ever pans out.) In either case, the long term survival of our species depends on the resources that can be found in space.



__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Date:

I've read Lucifer's Hammer. Not a pretty life after Hamner-Brown.

This Rickards guy is utterly mindless. I seriously doubt Idaho would be a favorable site for an spaceport. His fear of fall-out is completely ridiculous, as well! Wouldn't the mountains act as a trap for radioactive material, if there was any hypothetical fall-out to speak of? NERVA (as an example) does not irradiate its propellant, which would probably be hydrogen.

Insanity abound.

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 411
Date:

I think its unfortunate that the DoE failed to bring appropriate props to their presentation.
For example, they could have brought a plutonium-powered cardiac pacemaker to show around -- or perhaps even pay one of the people still walking around with these things, to attend the meeting (they stopped making these pacemakers a couple of decades ago).


 

__________________


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 411
Date:


Idaho Gives Lukewarm OK on Plutonium Plan


By CHRISTOPHER SMITH, Associated Press Writer


Mon Aug 29


BOISE, Idaho - The state of Idaho is supporting a U.S. Department of Energy proposal to start producing plutonium-238 for NASA and national security agencies at the federal nuclear research compound in eastern Idaho.



But in comments submitted Monday to the Energy Department, the state called on the Bush administration to spell out a plan to transfer the highly radioactive waste created at the Idaho National Laboratory to disposal sites out of state. And the state wants the DOE to allow independent monitoring of air emissions and workplace safety at the proposed $300 million production facility.


With those caveats, the administration of Gov. Dirk Kempthorne said it will endorse the federal government's plan to consolidate U.S. production of plutonium-238 "space batteries" at the 890-square-mile complex outside of Idaho Falls.


"It's a concept we can support, but there are some details that still need to be worked out and DOE needs to improve some of its evaluation and communication," said Kathleen Trever, Kempthorne's coordinator for INL oversight.


During a series of hearings earlier this summer around the state, public comment was generally opposed to the plan to begin the first U.S. production of plutonium-238 since the Energy Department shut down a weapons reactor at the Savannah River complex in South Carolina in the mid-1990s.


Unlike plutonium-239, plutonium-238 is not used in nuclear weapons. But because of the heat it generates during a lengthy decay period, the highly toxic material is used as a long-lasting power supply for deep-space satellites and in surveillance devices that are placed underwater or on land.


Because existing U.S. stockpiles are dwindling and treaties prevent the use of Russian-made plutonium-238 in national security applications, the Bush administration wants to use the existing Advanced Test Reactor at INL to make 11 pounds of plutonium-238 annually for 35 years, beginning in 2010.


The federal government wants to consolidate all the production, manufacture and development of the space batteries at the Idaho complex to reduce the security risk from shuttling portions of the batteries among existing assembly and production facilities at national laboratories in Tennessee, New Mexico and Idaho.


The production process would create about 95 55-gallon drums each year of "transuranic" waste - plutonium-contaminated gloves, tools, rags and other radioactive rubbish.


In the state's 19-page letter, sent Monday to the Energy Department's Washington, D.C. headquarters, Trever said DOE officials have offered conflicting statements on whether the Idaho waste would be classified as a byproduct of nuclear defense activities and therefore eligible for burial at the Waste Isolation Pilot Project (WIPP) in New Mexico. The confusion over disposal plans has been "damaging to DOE's credibility on a matter of key interest to Idaho," she wrote.


Idaho officials want written assurances from the agency that any waste created by the plutonium project will be shipped out of state rather than left atop the Snake River Aquifer, which is the major source of irrigation and drinking water for more than 10,000 square miles of southeastern Idaho. The state won't issue the necessary environmental permits for the plutonium project until the exit strategy for the nuclear waste is clearly outlined, Trever wrote.


The state also told DOE construction can't begin until a formal plan for independent monitoring of the plutonium battery project is in place.


"Even when the balance between open government and national security favors secrecy, we need independent oversight to protect human health and the environment," the state's letter to DOE said.


Trever said the state will review its own environmental monitoring and detection systems to determine whether it has the equipment and expertise necessary to independently verify DOE's own claims of safe operation.



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:

Independent air quality monitoring, and requiring a disposal plan for waste products--these seem like reasonable enough conditions. I would expect just about the same for any responsible commercial industrial/chemical process anyway....

However, abusing the EPA requirements for obstructionist purposes by requiring Environmental Impact Studies to be performed over and over again--this is where it is abusive and wasteful. I'm not entirely sure that this is happening at the proposed Idaho Pu-238 production fascility. It seems as though this is addressing legitimate concerns.

Perhaps someone else has a different take on this...?

-- Edited by GoogleNaut at 08:50, 2005-08-31

__________________


Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 23
Date:

WHAT HAS BEEN THE OUTCOME OF THIS?

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard