This is from an anti group urging negative comments. They "urge the DOE and NASA to develop alternative non-radioactive technologies for space exploration" without giving any hint of what that might be.... some sort of Karma power, no doubt ?
PUBLIC COMMENTS NEEDED FOR DOE/NASA PLAN TO EXPAND NUCLEAR POWER IN SPACE
The Department of Energy (DOE) announced its intent to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) for the proposed consolidation of nuclear activities related to production of radioisotope power systems (RPS) required for Government national security and space exploration missions at a single, highly secure DOE site. (Currently, DOE's ongoing RPS-related production operations are located at three DOE sites in Idaho, New Mexico and Tennessee.)
The nuclear infrastructure required to produce RPS is comprised of three major components: (1) The production of Plutonium-238; (2) the purification and encapsulation of Pu-238 into a fuel form; and (3) the assembly, testing, and delivery of the RPS to NASA and the Pentagon.
The RPS is the newest technology for deep-space missions. The Pu-238 in these units serves as the source for generating heat and electricity. The heat source can be used directly to warm critical spacecraft components. NASA claims that solar will not work in deep space but critics have long maintained that alternative space technologies, if research and development was undertaken, could be produced.
WRITTEN COMMENTS:
DOE invites public comments on this EIS. The public comment period concludes on January 31, 2005. We encourage people who live outside the U.S. to also send comments.
Comments or suggestions on the EIS, questions concerning the proposed action, and requests to be placed on the EIS distribution list may be directed to:
Timothy A. Frazier NE-50/Germantown Building Office of Space and Defense Power Systems U.S. Department of Energy 1000 Independence Avenue, SW Washington, DC 20585-1290 Telephone: 301-903-9420 Fax (800) 919-3765 E-mail to ConsolidationEIS@nuclear.energy.gov
KEY POINTS TO MAKE: (Please use your own words)
1) DOE historically has a bad track record of ecosystem contamination during the plutonium production, purification, assembly, and testing process. The expansion of this process will likely create more negative ecosystem impacts.
2) DOE has shown disregard for the public health and safety during the treatment, storage and disposal of plutonium waste, often contaminating local water supplies.
3) During the nuclear generator production process for the NASA Cassini mission over 244 cases of worker contamination were reported at Los Alamos Labs in New Mexico (between 1994-1996). DOE has consistently shown their inability to protect worker health and safety.
4) This EIS is being generated because NASA and DOE are undertaking a major expansion of launching nuclear power into space in the coming years. Recent disclosures about internal NASA tendencies to take short cuts on rocket safety makes the possibility of launch accidents and major environmental contamination of launch areas more likely.
5) The enormous cost of producing, assembling and launching highly radioactive nuclear materials into space cannot be justified when the nation has a major fiscal crisis. Cutbacks in education, health care, environmental clean-up and other social programs will be necessary to pay for the expansion of nuclear power for space missions.
6) In previous environmental impact statements NASA and DOE have acknowledged that a launch accident could result in massive contamination of significant land areas with nuclear materials.
7) For all these reason we call on DOE and NASA to suspend all plans and operations to produce, purify, assemble, test, and launch plutonium. Instead, we urge the DOE and NASA to develop alternative non-radioactive technologies for space exploration.
Global Network Against Weapons & Nuclear Power in Space PO Box 652 Brunswick, ME 04011 (207) 729-0517 (207) 319-2017 (Cell phone) globalnet@mindspring.com http://www.space4peace.org
Maybe this anti-space group just doesn't want any space explorative initatives by any nation, company or individual.
What's more...Has there been any discussions on how the U.S. could prohibit extraterrestrials from using nuclear power in their UFO's? No doubt they're polluting the earth's space and atmosphere with deadly emissions of some kind.
Personally I am against aliens who rely on the environmentally dirty dilithium crystals, as well as the even dirtier deuteroquintilithium-oxides. Their warp-bubbling particles tend to disrupt the space-time continuum around us. Who knows what it will be like in a few years, if they are not stopped?
The problem is not nuclear waste or accidents in SPACE. It is obvious that this program will expand nuclear industry on EARTH. I am against your Stangelove Mission.