Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
Post Info TOPIC: MIRA STAR UNRAVELED


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
MIRA STAR UNRAVELED


Recently news reports of a star MIRA A is seen as coming apart. This is a binary system MIRA A + MIRA B. As seen by UV wavelength filter by the GALEX spacecraft. Does anyone know why this star might not have followed the path of other stars having exhausted easy light nuclei fuel at the left top of the 'valley of stability' late enough in stellar life not to have exploded as a supernova ?

Could this Star keep burning fuel up the other side of the nuclei 'valley' or is this too difficult for most stars to burn? 

Although this spacecraft scans in the UV wide angle mode for faint galaxies in UV wavelengths wonder if a spacecraft with less sensitivity could video the heat from NTR engines of a spacecraft traveling to Moon or Mars in real time?

Attachments
__________________
Bruce Behrhorst


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 411
Date:

NUKE ROCKY44 wrote:
Could this Star keep burning fuel up the other side of the nuclei 'valley' or is this too difficult for most stars to burn? 

Because fusion "burning" increases mass (fusing two lighter nuclei to make a heavier one), the process is always from left to right on the "valley of stability" diagram.
So going "up the other side" is an endothermic process: energy is absorbed, rather than liberated.
That's why supernovae happen: the core collapses under its own weight, since there is no more energy production to counter gravity.
In the process, the outer layers get heated by a rebounding shockwave, which instantly ignites the light elements that remained in the outer layers.
BOOOOOM !



__________________


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:

Yep...

and interestingly enough, very high resolution computational hydrodynamic modelling suggests that this process is not as symmetric as once thought: turbulence in the hydrodynamic shockwave causes extensive fusion and stirring within the outer layers of the core--which produces far more heavy elements than once thought--and a greater fraction of them are ejected...

Supernovas end up producing quite a lot of heavy elements--and Supernova 1987A in the Large Magellanic Cloud is thought to have had a bright afterglow atleast in part powered by the decay of Nickel-56.






__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.

Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse
Powered by ActiveBoard