Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
NUCLEARSPACE MESSAGE BOARD (ACTIVE) -> NUCLEAR POWER AND PROPULSION IN SPACE -> NASA threat to cut MSL
Post Info TOPIC: NASA threat to cut MSL
NUKE ROCKY44


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
NASA threat to cut MSL
Permalink  

Top NASA managers will decide next week the fate of the Mars Science Laboratory, a nuclear-powered astrobiology rover that already has cost $1.5 billion and is likely to hit the 30-percent overrun ceiling that could trigger cancellation by Congress.

Officials from the agency's Mars Exploration Program (MEP) and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) are set to brief Administrator Mike Griffin and Science Associate Administrator Ed Weiler on the program next week.

Doug McCuistion, the MEP manager, told the NASA Advisory Council Oct. 2 that JPL probably will ask for a $100 million-$150 million increase to its $223 million fiscal 2009 budget - spread over FY '09-10 - to meet its September 2009 launch window. The program overran its $355 million FY '08 budget by $190 million, and is expected to overrun the total program cost reflected in the FY '08 NASA authorization by 33-40 percent. This could bring its total cost to more than $2 billion (Aerospace DAILY, Feb. 28). McCuistion doesn't expect JPL's request to be granted, due to the center's traditionally shaky cost estimating, but outside cost estimates have been prepared as well.


A slip to the 2011 launch window will add another $300 million-$400 million to the price tag, but Weiler worries JPL is so stretched trying to make the 2009 window that the result could be "a nuclear crater on Mars" from the rover's radioisotope thermoelectric generator. The MEP is out of cash, and the agency's Planetary Science Division has identified only about $70 million it can pull from other programs in the near term.


The MEP is stretched to its limits, McCuistion said, with no funding for technology development and "next to nothing" for education and public outreach. Research & Analysis (R&A) funding hasn't been touched yet, but NASA has faced harsh criticism from Capitol Hill for past R&A cuts. Since MSL itself can't be scaled back, additional funding might have to come from other Mars efforts, including development work for a future sample return mission, or from whatever mission is approved for the 2016 launch opportunity.

[link]



__________________
Bruce Behrhorst
GoogleNaut


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:
Permalink  

It would be a shame to have come this far--by now about 90% completion or better on the hardware build--and not fly the thing. The recent asteroid mission to Ceres and Vesta--was very nearly cancelled and it was at the 99% build level...
11th hour emergency appropriations from Congress saved that mission.

I hope it doesn't come to that--because I see a lower probability of an emergency appropriation coming through for MSL...

It seems to me that it makes sense to develop a standard rover chassis...and then build instruments for subsequent missions around that chassis. This should save millions of R&D costs--you don't have to 'reinvent the wheel' each time.

However, I do know that MSL is a more capable machine, it also costs a great deal more too.

I have suggested here and even wrote a little informal proposal to NASA suggesting that a device could be designed that could gently blow dust off the solar panels: using a small onboard Martian 'air compressor,' a small storage tank, and movable arm, and an array of nozzles could be used to gently lift dust off the panels. During the course of a day, air could be compressed and stored in the tank...and an air intake filter could be periodicly cleaned by back flushing with compressed air...

I just hope the MSL gets a chance to fly--it would be a real shame to have it get cancelled this close to a mission...



__________________
GoogleNaut


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:
Permalink  

I just read this moments ago:

http://www.space.com/news/0801010-mars-sciencelab-update.html

According to space.com, it looks like MSL was saved from the axe...

Thank goodness!


__________________
NUKE ROCKY44


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 400
Date:
Permalink  

It would be a shame to have come this far--by now about 90% completion or better on the hardware build--and not fly the thing.
GoogleNaut I'm so glad that NASA decided not to scrap MSL. Maybe they took your
advice. I would vote for you to be on some kind of board (member) on NASA 'cause they really do need someone grounded on good ideas.


NASA does need to change...

__________________
Bruce Behrhorst
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
NUCLEARSPACE MESSAGE BOARD (ACTIVE) -> NUCLEAR POWER AND PROPULSION IN SPACE -> NASA threat to cut MSL
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard