Members Login
Username 
 
Password 
    Remember Me  
NUCLEARSPACE MESSAGE BOARD (ACTIVE) -> SCIENCE & ENGINEERING -> ESA study finds in-flight oxidiser collection possible
Post Info TOPIC: ESA study finds in-flight oxidiser collection possible
10kBq Jaro


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 411
Date:
ESA study finds in-flight oxidiser collection possible
Permalink  

This sounds somewhat like the British SABRE engine....


http://www.flightglobal.com/articles/2007/07/10/215340/esa-study-finds-in-flight-oxidiser-collection-possible.html 

 10/07/07

SOURCE:Flight International

ESA study finds in-flight oxidiser collection possible

By Rob Coppinger

In-flight oxidiser collection possible, says ESA study

A European Space Agency-funded study has concluded that air liquefaction plants for a space transportation system's first-stage carrier aircraft are possible within the mass limits required.The first stage would collect air, liquefy it and separate the nitrogen, producing 10kg/s (22lb/s) with a 10,000kg (22,000lb) on-board liquefaction plant.

The advantage of such a system is that the preferred liquid-oxygen propellant does not have to be carried from the ground. Once collected, the oxygen-enriched liquefied air is stored in the second-stage reusable orbiter vehicle.
The plant's main mass drivers are the heat exchangers, of which there would be three. These have been a focus of the ESA study.

The study, involving Universite Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), developed the two-stage launch system concept that incorporates liquefaction.That system has a dual-hull, hydrogen-fuelled aircraft using six General Electric 90b engines as the carrier aircraft.
Between its two fuselages under the wing, it would carry an orbiter vehicle fuelled only with liquid hydrogen with a total mass of 90,000kg.

Taking off from the 15,000ft (4,575m) runway at the Vandenberg US Air Force base in California, the gross lift-off weight would be 1,035,000kg. It would cruise for 6,250km (3,378nm), during which it supersonically collects the air, out to the middle of the Pacific. At that point, the carrier aircraft would perform a 1.5g manoeuvre to drop the orbiter.

By the separation point, the orbiter would have been filled with 210,000kg of liquefied enriched air. Because it is not pure liquid oxygen, 2-3s in specific impulse is lost for every percentage point reduction in purity. Gases such as argon, which would be 6% of the liquefied air mass, are considered too difficult to separate.
"ESA funded this under its general studies programme," says ULB researcher Dries Verstraete.
"We are continuing to work on the collection plant. This is possible using today's or near-future technologies."

Verstraete says the researchers had compared their first-stage carrier aircraft design and mass with a similar Russian vehicle called Herakles and found them to be comparable.His team also contacted the US Air Force researchers working on their own system (Flight International, 25 April - 1 May 2006), but there has been little communication. 



-- Edited by 10kBq Jaro at 16:27, 2007-07-11

__________________
John


Senior Member

Status: Offline
Posts: 366
Date:
Permalink  

This seems an intesting alternative to the hypersonic scram jet plus rockets approach to developing a replacement shuttle. I assume that the second stage orbiter is fueled with hydrogen at takeoff but has an empty oxygen tank. If the aircraft is an normal jet fueled aircraft it would be ineresting that the consumption of its fuel would exceed the mass of oxygen going to the orbiter tank you would have a very interesting system. The aircraft could be a supercruiser going at Mach 2.5 to 3 perhaps at 80,000 or 90,000 feet at seperation. I wonder why this hasn't been pursued more agressively?

Also, why all of the argon? I'd think that nitrogen would be the big impurity.

__________________
GoogleNaut


Guru

Status: Offline
Posts: 606
Date:
Permalink  

Argon consititutes slightly less than 1% of Earth's atmosphere. Its density is nearly identical to oxygen when liquified. And its boil point is very similar--thus it requires a great deal of fractional distillation to extract it from liquid air. A flying liquid-air plant will likely not have the time or machinery mass available to extract the argon--so it is an impurity that will have to be dealt with...

Nitrogen is slightly lighter (fm wt 28 g/mol) than liquid oxygen (32 g/mol) and its boil point is slightly less--so a bucket of liquid air if allowed to sit for a few minutes will eventually boil off most of its nitrogen leaving behind oxygen enriched liquid air...



-- Edited by GoogleNaut at 19:58, 2007-07-16

-- Edited by GoogleNaut at 19:58, 2007-07-16

__________________
Page 1 of 1  sorted by
 
Quick Reply

Please log in to post quick replies.
NUCLEARSPACE MESSAGE BOARD (ACTIVE) -> SCIENCE & ENGINEERING -> ESA study finds in-flight oxidiser collection possible
Tweet this page Post to Digg Post to Del.icio.us


Create your own FREE Forum
Report Abuse 		Powered by ActiveBoard